Why We Need You
Out-of-County Placements Increasing
As our local foster home capacity has
decreased over the last year, more children have had to be placed in
homes outside of Hamilton County. Currently, over 30% of our foster
children are placed in these out-of-county homes.

An Unacceptable Trend
Placing foster children further away from
their home communities leads to less desirable outcomes for the County’s
most vulnerable kids. Many problems are created, including:
·
Uprooting children from
familiar surrounding makes the transition into foster care even more
traumatic, magnifying behavior issues.
·
Removing a child from their
school eliminates an important source of stability and makes any
academic success even more unlikely.
·
Keeping sibling sets
together becomes harder, increasing the chance of siblings losing
contact.
·
Visitations with biological
parents are more complicated and less common, making our ultimate goal
of reuniting the child with their family more difficult.
·
Because reunification is
less likely, children placed out-of-county tend to stay in foster care
for longer periods of time than similar children placed locally.
Darlene’s Story
Darlene, a nine year old in County
custody, has been placed in a residential treatment facility since
March. Starting in May, caseworkers have tried to locate a foster home
for her to be “stepped down” to as her needs do not require her to be in
residential care. Unable to find a home, she remains in RT in
Cleveland, placed with older, more troubled children. This placement
will only increase her behavior issues.
Affecting Children of All Ages
Typically, younger children are easier to
place in foster homes because they tend to have milder behavior
problems. This is increasingly not the case as even the youngest
children are being placed in out-of-county homes. Just recently, a
seven month old infant waited in the office for seven hours only to be
placed in a home in Columbus.
Rising Costs Strain Agency Budget
Placing children in homes outside of
Hamilton County also has financial implications for JFS operations as
costs associated with transportation and caseworker travel overtime
continue to rise.
Additionally, as seen in Darlene’s case,
the lack of available local foster homes has created a barrier to
stepping youth down from more restrictive settings, thus extending
lengths of stay in more restrictive,
more expensive placements.
In just Darlene’s case, her stay in
residential treatment cost the county $17,280 compared to the $11,120 it
would have cost to place her in a foster home. This is an unnecessary
35% increase in expenses.
Unaddressed, these
trends will continue to worsen in the coming years. Our success in
recruiting more foster homes in Hamilton County is essential to
preventing more children from facing similar outcomes.
|